01
Mar
2010
Cabin owners rebel against new rental regulations
In: World travel news
5 comments
Cabin owners rebel against new rental regulations ISLAND PARK — As of late Friday, Feb. 26, twenty-eight vacation cabin owners had filed paperwork with Fremont County protesting regulations the county commissioners recently imposed on people who rent their cabins on a short term basis.

They each filed a form provided by the state Attorney General’s office titled, “Request for Taking Analysis.”

The owners claim that the county has violated their private property rights and right to earn income by requiring that they comply with a long list of regulations, and pay annual fees, before they can rent their cabins on a short term basis.

The vacation cabin rental business is huge in Island Park and brisk in other areas of the county. Dozens of cabins are advertised on the internet, and several businesses, including Realtors, manage vacation cabin rentals for owners. Even the county’s prosecuting attorney, Joette Lookabaugh, owns a rental, which is advertised on line as the “Snake River Rental: Paradise for rent by the week or by the month (http://snakeriverrental.net).

Despite the vacation cabin rental business’s obvious importance to the economy, the county has never done a fiscal analysis to determine just how much money renters spend in the county, how many dollars in property taxes, sales taxes, gas taxes, and other fees vacation rental cabin owners and users pay, and how many jobs the vacation cabin rental business generates.

Abbie Mace, the county’s clerk and auditor, said she is time-and-date stamping the forms and turning them over to the county attorney’s office.

Marla Payne, owner of Outback Realty, said she submitted a form on Friday for a client who owns a rental. She said filing the form is the first step in an appeal that will be filed in district court. The appeal will be of the county commission’s Feb. 8 decision to regulate the rentals. The decision was made after a work session reviewing public testimony on the issue taken at a January public hearing. Fremont County’s deputy prosecutor, Blake Hall, argued for the regulations at the public hearing.

The appeal will most likely be filed by the Association of Idaho Realtors, whose legal staff has told the county several times it will appeal the regulations.


The county commission voted unanimously to approve the ordinance, which also regulates some home businesses.

One of the ordinance’s major impacts is that it ignores residential zoning in residential neighborhoods where there are vacation cabin rentals. It states that the County Commission, “declares that the use of a residential dwelling or home, or any part thereof, for the purpose of short-term or transient rental is a commercial use...”

If the appeal fails and the ordinance goes into effect in August, as per the ordinance, vacation cabin rental owners, some home business owners, and owners of small residential care facilities, will be required to apply for a two-year Class 1 permit to stay in business.

The ordinance states that vacation cabins provide, “a community benefit by expanding the number and type of lodging facilities available.”

It goes on to note that vacation cabins are also, “a community concern, due to the potential for increased traffic, noise, and density in residential neighborhoods if these uses are not properly regulated.” It notes that vacation rental cabins have the potential to “exceed standards for the design capacity of such structures and to cause health and safety problems, and as such may constitute a danger to life and adjacent property; and ... minimum health and safety standards are necessary to protect both the citizens of the county and the occupants of transient rentals.”

Island Park citizens first proposed regulating vacation cabins around five years ago when some renters created noise, traffic, and parking problems in neighborhoods. Since then, there have been several revisions of the initially proposed ordinance, and several public hearings. There were more supporters than detractors at the first round of hearings, the comments were around 50-50 during the next round, and in the next round, there were more opponents. In the most recent public hearing on the ordinance, all 14 people who testified were against the regulations.

Commissioners voting for the ordinance were Paul Romrell, chairman, Skip Hurt, and Lee Miller.

As noted, the Association of Idaho Realtors also opposes it, and opposed 2007, 2008, and 2009 drafts regulating vacation cabin rentals. In a January 26, 2010 letter, the association asks the commission to “reject” the proposed ordinance.

The letter states that the ordinance is, “of questionable legal merit, confusing in its placement in the (development) code, negative for the economy of Fremont County, and unjust to existing residents. As drafted, this proposal also appears to be a significant intrusion into the private property rights of landowners in Fremont County. While we certainly recognize the problems that may exist with some rental units today, it would seem to us that the most expedient way for the county to address these issues is through the enforcement of existing ordinances.”

The letter warns that if the regulations are approved, many owners will sell their vacation rental cabins. Owners of these cabins now pay full property taxes because they’re ineligible for the homeowner’s exemption. The letter notes that new owners would probably be eligible for the exemption, resulting in a loss in property tax collections. “The drop in values, coupled to the increase in homeowner's exemptions in the county, will cause a double shift in taxes to owner occupied homes as the levy rate increases to keep collections level,” states the letter.

The association also objects to the county applying different sets of onsite septic system regulations to similar pieces of property just because one property is rented for part of the year.

The letter states, “It is not clear whether Fremont County has the authority to impose more stringent restrictions when the state has already spoken on this matter. Idaho is not a ‘home rule’ state. It is further unclear whether these regulations meet the tests set out by the Idaho Attorney General with regard to Idaho's Regulatory Taking Act. We believe these regulations would have a significant impact on the landowner's economic interest, deny the owner of all economically viable uses of the property, and deny a fundamental attribute of ownership of the property.”


This is part of the February 25, 2010 online edition of The Island Park News.

Source:  Cabin owners rebel against new rental regulations

cheap jordans online  said on February 2th, 2012 at 12:10 pm
http://www.cheapjordansonline.com
This post is awesome,ecpecting the newest!
kbkb550  said on November 15th, 2011 at 1:23 am
Tips and Advice on Shoes for Women UGG Classic Tall Boots I Black

A few things to consider before you buy your flat foot shoes or even your wide shoes. You have to look at what your feet are telling you. There are several different types of feet you need to know about. Flat feet, if you have flat feet this means when you step with your foot it will leave a footprint that has no inward curve. Your footprint will look just like someone drew your print in the ground with no visible arch. Then there are High arches. Having high arches is when you leave your footprint in the ground and it leaves a print that looks like the heel and balls of your feet are not connected. Both of these types are not like a natural foot type. A natural foot type will leave a print behind that will have a natural curve on the inward side of the foot. Other types of feet to worry about are overpronators or supinators. Overpronators are when a person is walking they leave a trail that rolls inward during their stride. Supinators are trails that are left behind that roll outward during their stride. One must look at your stride prints to understand what is happening here. Another item to look at is how the shoe is made. Looking at a shoe and determining what kind of shoe you need has a lot of baring on how a shoe is made. First you need to look at the sole of your shoe. Is the sole comfortable? Then you should look at the sole, is it cemented together or stitched together. Both types of shoes are very good, however this maybe a preference that you have to decide. Looking at the interior there are all kinds of different styles but the best always seem to be the leather ones. Leather allows your foot to breathe and it absorbs the moisture, keeping it away from your foot. The heel of the shoe is also important. You need to know what the heel looks like put together. For example if your high heels are higher ones that means the price is a lot more. Those heels are made from plastic and covered with leather. Just like the price, the higher the heel the better the plastic is. You also need to know the shoe materials. Is it suede? Then they stain easily and need some type of spray protection. If they are patent, then they are polished leather and they resist dirt better. Then there is the oiled natural finish. These shoes are the most durable. Always check the material the shoe is made of before you buy them. If your not sure check the detail information on the shoes. There are different types of shoes as well. Motion control shoes are rigid and durable, they are very control orientated and made to reduce overpronators.This type of shoe would be good for a overpronated foot. Stability shoes are a blend of cushioning, support, and durability. These shoes are not typically made for average weight people, it is not essential for them. Cushion shoes are used for supinator feet. They focus primarily on straightening out the walk. There are also light weight training shoes available.They are basicly used for physical activities, like running.Trail shoes are another option. they give the wearer traction, stability and durability. Hikers need this style of shoe because it has a more supportive upper and a thicker sole. Having the right shoe goes a long way in your over all health. These are a few things you should look at before you buy your shoes. Hopefully this information will help you put your best foot forward. Good luck. About Author Trying to get the health word out there. I am a partner in a healthy lifestyle information site: Classic Metallic Tall ugg boots I also partner with a huge mall of stores and products, cash back items, We sell OPC-3 for joint pain, vitamins and much more at: . UGG Classic Metallic Tall Boots Marbled . This article is free for republishing Published at UGG Classic Cardy Boots Blue UGG Classic Short Boots Tomato Red UGG Classic Short Boots Special Green

nannanwe  said on September 27th, 2010 at 7:27 am
Idaho is not a ‘home rule’ state. It is further unclear whether these regulations meet the tests set out by the Idaho Attorney General with regard to Idaho's Regulatory Taking Act. We believe these regulations would have a significant impact on the landowner's economic interest
Lou  said on August 8th, 2010 at 3:35 am
I am also part of a travel community, http://www.SojournVacationRentals.com for you travel and vacation rentals.
jim ellingson  said on June 28th, 2010 at 11:05 am
We are having the same problems in Mille Lacs County, Minnesota. What are the regulations proposed by Fremont County? We need regulations that are taking away the integrity of residential areas. What is the status today with your regulations? Thank you for your time.

Leave a Reply

Name
Email
Comment
Verification code